The Coronavirus panic provided the perfect opportunity for Bill Gates to transition from tech billionaire to global health sage. He has a plan to pull us out of this mess, and no amount of hydroxychloroquine can be allowed to get in the way – successful treatments be damned. But Gates isn’t the only one who knows what’s at stake. Anthony Fauci was a director at the National Institutes of Health in 2005 when an NIH study on hydroxychloroquine found it to be a “potent inhibitor" of SARS coronavirus "with strong anti-viral effects." The study demonstrated that the drug worked both prophylactically and therapeutically to combat the illness.
This raises an important question: If the drug worked so well on one coronavirus – and was being used successfully by physicians throughout the world way back then, as it is now – why would Fauci and Gates act in tandem to quell any optimism about the treatment option for our current outbreak? Why would Fauci minimize the drug's merely "anecdotal" success at fighting Coronavirus when, as the former director of the government body that proved its efficacy against SARS, he knew full well it was a coronavirus killer?
Show Me the Money
One reason might lie in the fact that the Gates Foundation gifted a $110 million grant to Anthony Fauci, and that the two men have a long-running association – and likely a shared agenda about world health. Both men have gloom and doomed their way through the pandemic even though, on March 26 in the New England Journal of Medicine, Fauci quietly adjusted the initial mortality models for American Coronavirus deaths from 2.2 million down to around 70,000. This was a diminution by orders of magnitude, which would result in COVID-19 deaths being "ultimately more akin to those of severe seasonal influenza, which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%," according to Fauci. Naturally, no one in the media bothered to report this salient detail. Nor were the mainstream media diligent or honest enough to remember that the Hong Kong Flu of 1968 killed 100,000 Americans – but we didn't lock down the planet, destroy the economy, incur the highest unemployment numbers since the Great Depression, and wait breathlessly for the mythical vaccine unicorn of salvation. And still we managed to hold Woodstock – the very antonym of social distancing.
The incurious Fourth Estate also regularly ignores even more recent mortality numbers from the 2017-2018 flu season, during which an estimated 80,000 Americans died of influenza, in favor of a narrative that this outbreak is without precedent. This same vacuum of thoughtful reporting existed in 2010. Back then, Gates declared the coming ten years "the decade of vaccines," pledged $10 billion to the cause, and endorsed the Healthy People 2020 initiative to make adult vaccines compulsory by this year. The gentleman who chaired the "Leadership Council" for that Gates Foundation effort? Anthony Fauci.
REAL ID, real tyranny?
Healthy People 2020's engine for compliance of adult vaccine uptake was meant to be the federal REAL ID Act, which was passed in 2005 and slated to be rolled out this year, though it has been pushed back to 2021 because of Coronavirus. Beginning next year, Americans who want to drive, travel, buy alcohol, get a job, get a mortgage, or pick up Journey reunion tickets at the will call window, will need to have a government-issued REAL ID that is linked to their social security number, so it can be tracked nationally and internationally. The REAL ID Act gives the Department of Homeland Security the ability to expand its powers over who is allowed the ID, and the conjectures are that it will require proof of up to date adult vaccinations, according to newly established CDC guidelines. The current pandemic has fortuitously provided the perfect global fear moment to sell this idea of mandatory worldwide vaccination of both children and adults. Keep stoking fear – as the Pharma-funded mainstream media has always done – and people will throw caution to the wind and line up for a full battery of jabs, the vast majority of which no adults have had since early childhood. This was unthinkable even a few months ago.
So, running interference for China and the WHO and razing hopes about hydroxychloroquine weren't even close to the top of Gates' to-do list. Of greatest importance to him were the twin priorities of developing a Coronavirus vaccine faster than any other in human history and heralding to the world media its imminent and sacred arrival. Gates has worked his turf like a Hollywood PR guy, rarely missing an on-camera opportunity to run the trailer for his coming attraction – albeit with the wildly gesticulating arms of a roadside inflatable tube man. Often before he is even asked, Gates intones that life will not resume normally until we have a vaccine. He has assured us, based on exactly zero science, that it will be 18 months before we return to our previous lives – the very same amount of time Gates and others have predicted to produce a vaccine ready for use by 7.5 billion people.
The Hidden History of Gates Medicine
There are several things Bill Gates isn't saying in these many interviews, however, things that cast a shadow across his carefully stage-managed efforts to fashion himself the Coronavirus Superman, here to red cape earth during a pandemic we now understand to be as deadly as seasonal flu. One is that Gates is skipping animal trials because he's so enthusiastic about getting the vaccine to market – an idea a first grader would recognize as terrible. Another is that there has never been a successful coronavirus vaccine developed – ever. And a third is that vaccines typically take years to develop and test for safety, and yet are often still ineffective, such as the seasonal flu vaccine which was 3% effective for children and 9% effective for adults last year and has a two-decade record of being around 38% effective – or roughly as reliable as the '93 Toyota Corolla you still have, but never drive anymore. But software developer Bill Gates can apparently deliver results in a fraction of the time, conveniently omitting the fact that the Dengvaxia vaccine for Dengue Fever took 20 years to develop and still killed 14 Filipino children in its first trials, with another 600 deaths under investigation – following which, that country abandoned the vaccine.
What other lies of omission is the universal mandatory vaccine advocate, Bill Gates, delivering uncontested to his adoring media hand puppets? Gates never mentions that India "disinvited" the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation based on its onerous conflicts of interest with Big Pharmaceutical. This was actually incredibly polite of India, considering Gates has been accused of ethical violations in running secret safety trials of the HPV vaccines Cervarix and Gardasil on young Indian girls in remote provinces – charges that are still tied up in India's Supreme Court. The curious case of the world's second-richest man is themed around the idea that people are in thrall to money, power, intelligence, and success – all of which Bill Gates has in excess. This is why he's never subject to any frank questioning in any interviews, such as why, despite his concerted efforts, India and Japan suspended their HPV vaccine programs in 2010 and 2013, respectively, after numerous alarming incidents of vaccine-related death and injury in both countries.
The Inconvenient Truth Left Unsaid
A legion of IQ-struck interviewers – none of whom have ever lobbed anything but softballs at Mr. Microsoft – obsequiously mollycoddles Gates. He has yet to be asked about the 2010 Gates Foundation-funded phase 3 trials of GSK's experimental malaria drug that killed 151 African infants, according to the New England Journal of Medicine, and which caused adverse side effects including seizure, paralysis, and convulsions in over 1,000 additional children. To ask questions of him about such concerns might take away from Gates' relentless burnishing of his "just another aw-shucks genius in nerdy glasses" persona – and so they are never broached.
Like negative space in a painting, the many things always left unsaid in these generally fawning interviews with Gates divert attention away from his troubling track record and toward his preferred narrative. The inconvenience of a 2017 study by Soren Mogensen that demonstrated a ten-fold increase in deaths of African girls immunized with the DTP vaccine administered by the WHO is one of them. Gates is one of the World Health Organization's biggest donors, so he naturally worked hand in glove with the organization to aggressively ignore this alarming data – and refused to remove the deadly vaccine from the market. When inoculating tens of millions of African children a year with a dangerous jab, it appears collateral damage is an inevitable, regrettable, but necessary outcome.
Although he alluded to it in an interview with CNN's Fareed Zakaria, Gates tends to skirt the question of contact tracing, which is a way to "trace" those who have had Coronavirus or potentially those who have been vaccinated for it – either a necessary bureaucratic innovation or an unsettling Orwellian encroachment on civil rights, depending on your perspective. Also apparently under consideration are "bio-sensitive" smart tattoos, originally developed by MIT and later funded by Gates, that would embed an invisible ink mark in the skin for those who've been vaccinated, which can only be seen under infra-red light from a cell phone app – something that is sure to delight Jewish families and other students of 20th century history.
Gates has either omitted entirely, or remarked casually on all the above, in the same off-hand way he discussed the idea of vaccines leading to a 10% reduction in world population in a 2010 TED Talk, without bothering to explain what he really meant – which, as his defenders energetically insist, was that improved vaccine uptake in third world countries would remedy the problem of families having to have so many children. Or something.
A month after his eyebrow-raising TED Talk, the Gates Foundation-funded WHO was forced to admit that it had been developing sterility vaccines for over a decade. So did Gates misspeak that day or was it rather more than a slip of the tongue? The Gates Foundation spends just $650 million of its $5 billion budget on clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development, which is the most unequivocal testimony to his priorities and proof positive of his keynote theme that good health only comes in a syringe – something he should get cross-stitched on accent pillows in every one of his many homes.
Full Indemnity – Because Vaccines Are Totally Safe
But the one thing Bill Gates really doesn't want you to know is that he is so concerned about the grievous vaccine injuries that will inevitably result from a fast-tracked vaccine with rushed safety trials administered to everyone on the planet that he asked for – and got – full indemnity for any injury, complication, or death resulting from the Coronavirus vaccine. This is the same total indemnity, by the way, that Big Pharmaceutical and every medical professional who administers their vaccines enjoy, including the CVS pharmacist who flu-jabbed you, then gave you a free $5 gift card. None of them can be sued if the vaccine causes injury or death – a unique carve-out in American history. And now, non-scientist Bill Gates – elected to nothing and without a medical background – gets the same sweetheart deal for his unformulated vaccine that he plans to give to Every. Human. Being. On. Earth.
This need for indemnity flies in the face of everything we are unendingly told by the mainstream media: "Vaccines are safe." Even though a federally funded National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) exists and has paid out over $4 billion in claims against a mere 1% of total injuries, according to a Harvard study, why would one need indemnity for a vaccine that will be administered to everyone on the planet if it is so safe? And who would be able to grant such immunity? Surely it would have to be some senior official with many years of experience and a stellar reputation – but who?
Anthony Fauci – Who Else?
Fauci is effectively the bureaucratic Zelig of Government Health, popping up at critical inflection points throughout his half-century-long career. He has been head of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for the better part of 37 years – a run that is commensurate with that of J. Edgar Hoover over at the FBI. Whether it is best practice for one man to have that kind of power and influence over a federal institution over such a long period of time is worth asking about Fauci, as it is about Hoover – not that it would do much good at this point. As silent partners in a shared vision of global health, it only makes sense that Gates would continue to unfurl his grand plan for the planet without the liability concerns from which Fauci has provided him protection. One mustn't worry too much about people suffering terrible vaccine injuries such as Guillain-Barre' Syndrome (in Gates' HPV trials) or dying by the thousands (in Gates' DTP trials) when you're trying to save the world – right?
Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci: Coronavirus Crusaders
They've become a dynamic duo of sorts, Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci – an alliance of silence on the many truths they've agreed to suppress about the Coronavirus pandemic and world health. One of these successfully obfuscated inconvenient truths is that Fauci funded the Wuhan Lab from which the virus possibly originated to the tune of nearly $4 million over the last five years to bankroll gain of function studies on coronaviruses. Gain of function studies were banned in the U.S. back in 2013 because they are dangerous. The possibilities for an accidental escape of a virus being manipulated to increase its super-virulence (gain of function) are incredibly high, and the catastrophic results of such a mistake are even higher still. The question of why scientists are trying to make viruses so virulent that they can spread across the globe in a relative heartbeat is difficult to fathom for the typical layperson and best left to great minds – such as Fauci and Gates – to answer. Privately.
Anthony Fauci, Smooth Political Operator
Gushing retrospectives of "America's Doctor" Anthony Fauci also conveniently elide over the fact that he has been a skilled, if ruthless, political operator throughout his matchless tenure in government – although this is a near redundancy, as very few who survive that long in a high-level bureaucracy do so without being some degree of Machiavellian. In 1983, Fauci maneuvered to purloin the discovery made by Drs. Frank Ruscetti and Judy Mikovits about the connection between HIV and AIDS to allow his protégé, Robert Gallo, to replicate, publish, and claim credit for it. This was a clever machination that got Fauci promoted to head of NIAID – and delayed potential treatment for people living with AIDS by six months, causing untold additional deaths from that terrible disease.
Fauci may have proved himself a smooth political operator, and he may have pivoted 180% throughout this year on whether Coronavirus was a threat (no, then yes), whether we needed face masks (no, then yes), whether quarantines help (yes, then no), whether we should shake hands (no), have sex with strangers (yes), and on when we can open America again and send children back to school (after we flatten the curve, or … who knows?). Still, he is genial by all accounts, and America loves him. The fact that we have decided to effectively entrust one man and his billionaire benefactor to steer a course for our nation's future doesn't really occur to most of us. Liking Fauci means we give him the wheel – with Bill Gates riding shotgun.
Tune in tomorrow to learn more about Big Pharmaceutical and Bill Gates’ role as the Pharaoh of Pharma.
~
Read more from Pennel Bird.
.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
