Ruling in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, on June 13, 2024, the majority opinion declared that "Under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff's desire to make a drug less available for others does not establish standing to sue. Nor do the plaintiffs' other standing theories suffice. Therefore, the plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA's actions."
The question presented was:
"[W]hether the plaintiffs have standing to sue under Article III of the Constitution."
Oral Arguments
You can hear the oral arguments for this case here:
Or listen to them directly on the Supreme Court’s website here.
The Ruling
You can read the final ruling in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine either in our read in full below, or click here for a PDF
.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
