Skip to main content
Liberty Nation News
Follow Us
Donate
Liberty Nation News
Crime & Punishment

Alvin Bragg, His Record, and the Shaky Trump Indictment

Is the Manhattan DA with a record of leniency making an exception for Trump?

Graham Noble
Graham Noble
Mar 22, 2023
Alvin Bragg, His Record, and the Shaky Trump Indictment

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 08: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg speaks during a press conference after Steve Bannon, former advisor to former President Donald Trump surrendered at the NY District Attorney’s office to face charges on September 08, 2022 in New York City. Bannon faces a new criminal indictment that will mirror the federal case in which he was pardoned by former President Donald Trump. He and others have been alleged to have defrauded contributors to a private $25 million fundraising effort to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border according. (Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg wasted no time getting to work after he took his position in January 2022. During his first year, the new DA, a former civil rights attorney, downgraded 52% of the felony cases his office was handling to misdemeanors, according to a New York Post report from November of that year. Even before that, he sent out a “Day One” memo informing his attorneys that they would not be prosecuting a range of crimes unless the offenses were linked to at least one felony count. Major crimes in Manhattan North were up 17% in 2022 over the previous year and up 38% in Manhattan South. However, Bragg had bigger fish to fry - namely, former-President Donald Trump, who is widely expected to be indicted sometime in the next week.

Bragg chose not to prosecute crimes, including marijuana misdemeanors, trespass, traffic violations, resisting arrest, refusing to pay a fine, possession of a “non-firearm weapon,” and prostitution. In his first year as DA, Bragg declined to prosecute 35% more felonies than his predecessor had in 2019, the last year before the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the court system. Bragg is also not a fan of pre-trial detention, which he sees as a last resort. Thus, it can be assumed that the former president, if indicted, will not be going straight to jail.

The Not So Tough on Crime Alvin Bragg

Two cases in particular got Bragg some newspaper column inches, though for all the wrong reasons. On July 1, 2022, ex-con Austin Simon, a 35-year-old black man, entered a Manhattan bodega, ran behind the counter, and attacked the clerk, Jose Alba, 51. During the violent confrontation, Alba grabbed a knife and stabbed Simon, who died. Simon’s girlfriend, who was also in the bodega, then allegedly took a knife out of her purse and stabbed Alba in the shoulder. She was not charged but the clerk, who had no criminal record, soon found himself in Rikers Island jail awaiting trial for murder. He was unable to post $250,000 bail – which was half of what Bragg’s office had demanded.

The case against Alba was dropped after news of the circumstances of his alleged crime caused a backlash against, in this case, the overzealous DA.

The following month, 25-year-old Justin Washington was offered a plea deal after he was charged with raping a teenage relative. He was looking at just 30 days in jail and five years on probation. “That is a sweet deal,” one NYPD officer observed. “He went from rape one and facing 25 years in jail, which is hard time, to 30 days. What a joke.” While awaiting sentencing, Washington violently assaulted four other women and a man.

Former Trump Advisor Steve Bannon Indicted, Turns Himself In

(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

In Trump’s case, though, it is widely thought that Alvin Bragg will do the opposite of what he prefers and attempt to bump up to a felony what would otherwise be a misdemeanor. House Republicans have demanded that Bragg turn over communications and documents regarding the Trump case, which is based upon an alleged campaign finance law violation, and appear before Judiciary Committee to explain himself.

Bragg’s predecessor at the Manhattan DA’s office, Cyrus Vance Jr., dropped his own investigation into Trump’s alleged transgression. Later, the Federal Election Commission also declined to recommend charges after probing the matter. Bragg himself said last year that he did not believe his office had enough to indict the former president but later reconvened a grand jury to examine the case.

On Solid Ground?

Even most left-leaning pundits believe Bragg is on very shaky ground. CNN political commentator Van Jones clearly agrees. On March 20, Jones said, “I think that the heat is on this DA, I think he’s going to make a very sober decision and I would not be surprised if he doesn’t step back from the brink.”

In the end, it is the Comey factor that might decide things. In 2016, then-FBI Director James Comey was pilloried by Democrats for disclosing that the Bureau was investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server for government business. At the time, Clinton was a presidential candidate and, to this day, a lot of people on the left complain that Comey should not have revealed the investigation because it may have influenced the election. Bragg must now decide whether he is willing to be seen as the man who interfered in the 2024 election by indicting the candidate who, at this point, is most likely to secure the Republican nomination.

Alexander Hamilton James Madison
Free with the Daily Briefing 85Essays Unravel the Constitution

About the Author

Graham Noble

Graham Noble

Chief Political Correspondent & Satirist

Chief Political Correspondent & Humorist at LibertyNation.com. The son of a World War II veteran, Graham is himself a former British soldier and combat vet who immigrated to the United States in 2000. A Liberty Nation author since early 2017, Graham’s writing is inspired by a fierce passion for individualism and freedom and a healthy distrust of government, no matter who is in charge. Rejecting the common labels used to identify political parties and factions, Graham considers himself a constitutionalist, believing that the United States of America should be governed in strict accordance with the text of the founding documents – nothing more and nothing less.
View All Articles

Spread the truth - share this article

Liberty Nation TV

Watch the latest video commentary and analysis