Is this really a free speech issue? Listen to Tim Donner and Scott Cosenza discuss the facts and arguments of CNN/Jim Acosta vs. Donald J. Trump.
BREAKING NEWS
- Follow us on Facebook
- WHATFINGER - THE INTERNET'S CONSERVATIVE NEWS FRONT PAGE
- Free Press International
- Texas Rally Crowd Chants ‘Bring Them Home’ in Support of Trump’s Foreign Policy
- Elevator to the Moon: A Dream Come True or Just Fantasy?
- Trump likens Syria violence to schoolyard fight, credits ‘unconventional’ approachase-fire
- Will Trump Take Media Hit Over Cummings’ Death?
- Honest socialists vs. Elizabeth Warren
- Liberty Nation Live Updates: March for Trump DC
- The Democrats Descend on Ohio By Kyle Kondik
- Liberals Demand to #DeleteFacebook After Zuckerberg Met with Conservatives
- Mattis Jokes About Trump’s Criticism: ‘I Guess I’m the Meryl Streep of Generals’
- Impeachment Bluff – Who Holds the Cards?
- Reporter’s Notebook: Rep. Elijah Cummings’ megaphone goes silent
- Another Police Shooting: What Is Going On?
- Megyn Kelly defends CNN impeachment coverage after Tucker Carlson criticism
- Illegals Crime Report: Despicable Crimes
- Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
- US-China Trade: Phase One or Phase Zero?
- Exclusive: Carrie Severino Explains Radical Left’s Effort to Pack SCOTUS with Activist Judges
- Liberty Nation On The Go: Listen to Today’s Top News 10.17.19
Media, Podcasts, Politics, Uprising
The Uprising Podcast: Acosta v. Trump
It's a dangerous precedent to have a judge tell the president who can and cannot enter his home.
Watch Now
We Recommend
About the author
Related Articles
© 2018 A Project of One Generation Away | WordPress Website Design and Social Media Management by KMAAC
Use our New Improved Login to post a comment
Or Register by clicking here.
One Comment
lazarus
This is a judge that Trump selected which is an indicator of the depth of the insidious treachery of the Left – you cannot believe anything ANYONE tells you. How can a judge who has gained a Presidential appointment because he presented himself as a constitutionalist reveal so clearly that he is NOT what he said he was at all and over such a trivial, no-brainer issue???? This Judge is of the same cut of cloth as Super Narcissistic Acosta, a judge who never met a sound byte he would not embrace. A judge who is willing to trample the Constitution’s separation of powers for the sake of his moment in the limelight??? and Who can you believe anymore if they are as willing as this judge is to subvert the vetting process with a total “Judas Iscariot” betrayal???