Is this really a free speech issue? Listen to Tim Donner and Scott Cosenza discuss the facts and arguments of CNN/Jim Acosta vs. Donald J. Trump.
BREAKING NEWS
- Follow us on Facebook
- WHATFINGER - THE INTERNET'S CONSERVATIVE NEWS FRONT PAGE
- Warren: Even If Impeachment Proceedings Fail, It Would Be a Worthy Use of Time and Resources
- Impeachment: Faucahontas Picks up Where Mueller Left off
- Liberal Reporter Lays Out Big Media-Pushed Collusion Myths Mueller Report Destroyed
- Someone Did Something to Omar and She’s Not Happy
- CNN wanted accusations against Trump to be true, White House spokesman says
- Mueller Report: Conclusions Without the Spin
- Nearly 4-in-5 GOP Women: Shut Down Border to Halt All Illegal Immigration
- Why the World Hates Christians
- Pete Buttigieg Defends Late-Term Abortion: It’s A Woman’s ‘Personal Decision’
- Obstruction Hunting Season Opens – No Bag Limit
- Trump campaign says it raised over $1 million since Mueller report’s release
- Media Implosion: Talking Loud and Saying Nothing
- Eric Swalwell: Trump Campaign Not Owed Apology for Spying
- Mueller’s Lovely Parting Gift to Democrats
- Anti-Semite Jeremy Corbyn’s British Labour Party Tries Wooing Jews With Passover Message. They Blew It.
- Mueller Madness: It Just Keeps Going On and On
- Donna Brazile: Obama did ‘everything he could’ to prevent Russian meddling
- Mueller Report Unleashed – Prepare for Chaos
Media, Podcasts, Politics, Uprising
The Uprising Podcast: Acosta v. Trump
It's a dangerous precedent to have a judge tell the president who can and cannot enter his home.
We Recommend
About the author
Related Articles
© 2018 A Project of One Generation Away | WordPress Website Design and Social Media Management by KMAAC
One Comment
lazarus
This is a judge that Trump selected which is an indicator of the depth of the insidious treachery of the Left – you cannot believe anything ANYONE tells you. How can a judge who has gained a Presidential appointment because he presented himself as a constitutionalist reveal so clearly that he is NOT what he said he was at all and over such a trivial, no-brainer issue???? This Judge is of the same cut of cloth as Super Narcissistic Acosta, a judge who never met a sound byte he would not embrace. A judge who is willing to trample the Constitution’s separation of powers for the sake of his moment in the limelight??? and Who can you believe anymore if they are as willing as this judge is to subvert the vetting process with a total “Judas Iscariot” betrayal???