Skip to main content
Liberty Nation News
Follow Us
Donate
Liberty Nation News
Military Affairs

The Status of America’s Golden Fleet

In the race to build battle-force navies, can the United States equal China’s fleet in capability?

Dave Patterson
Dave Patterson
Sep 2, 2026
The Status of America’s Golden Fleet

(Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

As it stands, the US Navy has 291 battle-force ships. China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has more than 370, not counting about 60 Houbei-class missile patrol craft. The Congressional Research Service and the Pentagon have long described the PLAN as the world’s largest navy by hull count. It is still growing. Official assessments have projected roughly 395 ships in the near term and 435 by 2030. Until now, quality and capability have offset the numbers gap. There comes a point, however, when “better is better” gives way to “more is better.” That is the problem the Navy’s Golden Fleet is meant to address.

The Golden Fleet is to include a new class of frigates and a Trump-class battleship. The frigates —designated FF(X) — are intended to be built at scale and close the PLAN numbers problem. The Wall Street Journal reported: “The U.S. Navy will commission a new class of frigates, the first in a series of warships that will make up President Trump’s envisioned ‘Golden Fleet’ … The new ship will be based on the Coast Guard’s Legend-class National Security Cutter, which Ingalls builds in Pascagoula, Miss., and will replace the Constellation-class frigate that the Navy canceled last month after years of delays.” An aside worth noting: Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII/Ingalls) earlier offered a National Security Cutter derivative, the Patriot Frigate, in the FFG(X) source selection competition won by Fincantieri.

Alexander Hamilton James Madison

Free with the Daily Briefing

85Essays

Unravel the Constitution

Hamilton, Madison & Jay’s complete case for America, free and searchable in the Publius Reader.

Free with the Daily Briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

A January 2026 Congressional Research Service report said the Navy “envisages building a notional total of 50 to 65 FF(X)s.” The lead ship is planned as a sole-source award to HII/Ingalls, with the first hull to be launched in 2028 and later ships opened to competition at additional yards. CRS and the Navy quoted then-Secretary of the Navy John Phelan on the purpose of the program: “Our goal is clear: launch the first hull in the water in 2028. To expand capacity and production across our maritime industrial base, we will acquire these ships using a lead yard, and competitive follow-on strategy for multi-yard construction. Shipyards will be measured against one outcome: delivering combat power to the Fleet as fast as possible.” The FY2027 president’s budget request funds one FF(X) in 2027, one in 2029, and two in 2031.

The FF(X), with a displacement estimated to be 4,750 tons, is anticipated to be equipped with a point-defense anti-air warfare system rather than an area-defense system. This capability will provide anti-air defense closer to the accompanying fleet. Other capability will be provided by “containerized mission packages … For example, the Army and Lockheed Martin developed the MK-70 vertical launch system with the dimensions of a 40-foot shipping container.” In parallel, the Navy is developing containerized modular systems that “can be swapped from ship to ship.” Again, it’s interesting to note that a similar modular approach was adopted for the Littoral Combat Ship that was also canceled short of its initially planned production run.

Liberty First Daily Briefing

When it became clear that the Constellation-class frigate could not recover schedule and cost, a different course was required. That does not make the substitute risk-free. In “The U.S. Navy Must Build the ‘Golden Fleet,’” the Heritage Foundation warned: “Even the straightforward idea of repurposing a Coast Guard cutter no longer in production for the Navy as a frigate comes with significant risk. Modifications will be required for carrying munitions like torpedoes, expanded berthing for air crew, and to employ sonar for submarine detection.” The Navy has awarded HII/Ingalls $282.9 million for initial lead-yard work on the FF(X).

The FY2027 request allocates about $1.43 billion for the first production ship against a full-up cost of about $1.67 billion. If history is a guide, those figures will rise. The Navy’s record of delivering ships on cost, on schedule, and to specification is poor. Using a hull already built in series is the bet that cost growth can be contained. Completing a 50-to-65-ship class without fits and starts is the larger test. Without that discipline, the Golden Fleet will not keep pace with China.

 ~

The views expressed are those of the author and not of any other affiliate.

4 Questions

The story, in brief

1What is the US Navy's Golden Fleet meant to do?

The Golden Fleet is meant to address the Navy's ship numbers gap with China's navy. The concept centers on adding a new class of frigates and a Trump-class battleship, with the frigates intended to be built at scale to help close the PLAN's advantage in hull count.

2Why is the US Navy replacing the Constellation-class frigate with FF(X)?

The Navy canceled the Constellation-class frigate after years of delays. When it became clear the program could not recover schedule and cost, the Navy chose a different course based on a ship derived from the Coast Guard's Legend-class National Security Cutter.

3How will the US Navy build the new FF(X) frigates?

The lead ship is planned as a sole-source award to HII/Ingalls, with the first hull targeted to be launched in 2028. The Navy says it will use a lead-yard and competitive follow-on strategy, opening later ships to competition at additional yards to expand capacity and speed delivery.

4What risks could slow the US Navy's Golden Fleet frigate program?

The program is not risk-free, even though it uses a hull already built in series. Heritage warned the cutter design will need modifications for munitions, expanded air crew berthing, and sonar for submarine detection, and the Navy has a poor record of delivering ships on cost, on schedule, and to specification.

Download the Liberty Nation News App here

About the Author

Dave Patterson

Dave Patterson

National Security Correspondent

National Security Correspondent at LibertyNation.Com. Dave is a retired U.S. Air Force Pilot with over 180 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the former Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller and has served in executive positions in the private sector aerospace and defense industry. In addition to Liberty Nation, Dave’s articles have appeared in The Federalist and DefenseOne.com.
View All Articles

Spread the truth - share this article

Liberty Nation TV

Watch the latest video commentary and analysis