A lot of American pollsters woke up on Nov. 9, 2016, with egg on their collective faces. In print and on television, pollsters galore had to backpedal tout de suite. One would think these people – whose job it is to predict how citizens will vote – would have learned a thing or two from their national humiliation. Alas, these folks appear not to have learned a damn thing. Worse, they are shoveling the same manure into the public square in 2020, just as they did four years ago.
However, a select few called the 2016 contest between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump correctly. So, what are they saying this time?
Number 1: Trafalgar
Robert Cahaly runs the Trafalgar Group. These people don't put much stock in national polls, so they spend a lot of time surveying statewide elections. There is ample reason to avoid national surveys, but more on that later. In 2016, Trafalgar called Pennsylvania and Michigan for Trump. Cahaly rightly boasted, "We had the best poll in five of the battleground states in 2016. And I actually predicted 306 to 232 on the electoral college." So, why did the survey get it right when most others got it wrong? Trafalgar polls differently than mainstream polling operations. It focuses on certain realities that others do not consider. For example, it determined that conservatives are five times more likely to refuse to participate in poll queries. In addition, Cahaly's organization looks at something called "social-desirability bias," which is a fancy way of saying the shy voter is real. In a nutshell, some Americans don't want to go public with their opinions. Thus, Trafalgar's methodology is different from the average pollster. This time around, it is putting Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, Florida, and North Carolina in the Trump column, predicting the president will be re-elected. Cahaly told National Review's Rich Lowry, "If it all happened right now, my best guess would be an Electoral College victory [for Trump] in the high to 270s, low 280s." The sticking point is Pennsylvania:"Trump isn't there yet in Pennsylvania. Right now, we've got him down in Pennsylvania. I think if it were held today, the undecided would break toward Trump, and there'd be some hidden vote. He'd probably win Pennsylvania. But I'm going to give a caveat on only Pennsylvania. I believe Pennsylvania to be the No. 1 state that Trump could win and have stolen due to voter fraud."




.jpg&w=1920&q=75)

.jpg&w=1920&q=75)