Ruling in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, on June 22, 1992, the majority opinion declared, “The ordinance is facially invalid under the First Amendment.”
The question presented was:
Whether “the ordinance was substantially overbroad and impermissibly content based” in violation of the First Amendment.
Oral Arguments
You can hear the oral arguments for this case here:
Or listen to them directly on the Supreme Court’s website here.
The Ruling
You can read the final ruling in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul either in our read in full below, or click here for a PDF.
Loading...
