web analytics

Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Unlocking the vault on the most important Constitutional cases.

Ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, on June 29, 1992, the majority opinion declared:

a) “Although Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113, is not directly implicated by the Pennsylvania statute, which simply regulates and does not prohibit abortion, a reexamination of the ‘fundamental right’ Roe accorded to a woman’s decision to abort a fetus, with the concomitant requirement that any state regulation of abortion survive ‘strict scrutiny,’ id., at 154–156, is warranted by the confusing and uncertain state of this Court’s post-Roe decisional law.”

b) “The Roe Court reached too far when it analogized the right to abort a fetus to the rights involved in Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U. S. 510; Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390; Loving v. Virginia, 388 U. S. 1; and Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U. S. 479, and thereby deemed the right to abortion to be ‘fundamental.'”

c) “The [undue burden] standard presents nothing more workable than the trimester framework the joint opinion discards, and will allow the Court, under the guise of the Constitution, to continue to impart its own preferences on the States in the form of a complex abortion code.”

d) “The correct analysis is that set forth by the plurality opinion in Webster, supra: A woman’s interest in having an abortion is a form of liberty protected by the Due Process Clause, but States may regulate abortion procedures in ways rationally related to a legitimate state interest.”

The questions presented were:

  1. “[W]hether Roe’s central rule has been found unworkable.”
  2. “[W]hether the rule’s limitation on state power could be removed without serious inequity to those who have relied upon it or significant damage to the stability of the society governed by it.”
  3. “[W]hether the law’s growth in the intervening years has left Roe’s central rule a doctrinal anachronism discounted by society.”
  4. “[W]hether Roe’s premises of fact have so far changed in the ensuing two decades as to render its central holding somehow irrelevant or unjustifiable in dealing with the issue it addressed.”

Oral Arguments

You can hear the oral arguments for this case here:

Or listen to them directly on the Supreme Court’s website here.

The Ruling

You can read the final ruling in Planned Parenthood v. Casey either in our read in full below, or click here for a PDF.
Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [586.25 KB]

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From Liberty Nation Authors

Latest Posts

Jill Stein and the Democrat Headache

The self-anointed defenders of democracy are at it again, seeking to snuff out the presidential campaign of Green...

What Israel Could Do to Retaliate Against Iran

In the aftermath of Iran’s massive ballistic missile attack on Israel, the US and the world are waiting to see...