After nearly 40 hours, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, hopelessly hung at what most presume is an 11-1 decision for acquittal, clearly wasn’t going to agree unanimously. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial. So what does that mean for Clancy?
On January 24, 2023, Lindsay Clancy, who claims to have been suffering from postpartum depression and psychosis since the birth of her third child, strangled all three of her children with exercise bands and then attempted to kill herself. In what has been a controversial trial that sharply divided America, Clancy’s team applied a “lack of criminal responsibility” defense due to her alleged psychosis. It was convincing. Or, at the very least, the prosecution failed to convince all but one of the jurors otherwise.
Free with the Daily Briefing
85EssaysUnravel the Constitution
Hamilton, Madison & Jay’s complete case for America, free and searchable in the Publius Reader.
Free with the Daily Briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jury deliberations began on August 27, 2026, and by September 1, the jury began alerting the court that it was hopelessly deadlocked and unable to reach a unanimous verdict. Though 11 jurors seemed to be in favor of acquittal, one male holdout refused to budge. On Friday, September 4, Judge William Sullivan announced his intention to declare a mistrial. In a dramatic turn of events, however, defense attorney Kevin Reddington requested an emergency pause so he could file an appeal with the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts regarding the reluctant juror.
The defense claims the holdout juror is actually unlawfully refusing to apply the definition of reasonable doubt. Reddington was granted one hour to get the SJC to intervene before Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial.
Such an intervention was always a longshot, however. Trial judges are granted a great deal of deference when it comes to deciding if a juror is acting in bad faith or is genuinely deadlocked. The court could, however, have ordered Judge Sullivan to hold off on declaring a mistrial and investigate further, or it could even remove the juror and replace him with an alternate. The SJC justice did deny the appeal, leading Judge Sullivan to declare the mistrial. Reddington then pushed for a hearing based on a federal law, but the judge immediately denied it and called in the jury.
Plea offers are common in mistrials like this, but ultimately, when the prosecution doesn’t feel it has a real shot at winning, the state often declines to retry the case – at least for the time being.
.jpg&w=1920&q=75)