Are There Viable Solutions to America’s Health Care System?

Canada and the United Kingdom are not the answer.

by | Dec 8, 2025 | Articles, Healthcare

Hating on America’s health care system has become all the rage. And with good reason. Health care inflation is in the triple digits, US taxpayers are forced to subsidize insurance companies, and medical debt is a leading cause of bankruptcy. Some say the answer is to mirror Canada and the United Kingdom by adopting their single-payer models. But is this even a viable solution?

Tallying America’s Health Care Dollars

Total national health expenditures exceed $5 trillion a year. Health care accounts for about a fifth of the gross domestic product. Medical spending is growing at an alarming 7% annual rate. The $5 trillion is dedicated to hospitals, Medicare and Medicaid, pharmaceuticals, and private insurance. Wasn’t Obamacare supposed to make health care affordable?

The United States must be getting the best bang for its buck, especially considering that spending outpaces the rest of the world, right? Like education, allocating more dollars and cents does not equate to better outcomes.

Of course, this does not mean that America’s health care system is producing results comparable to those in places like Cuba. The United States leads the world in health care innovation, research output, and the development of advanced treatments. But for common ailments, surgeries, and baby deliveries, it is expensive with or without health insurance – and it is frustrating Americans.

Data from the People’s Voice Survey (2025), conducted by Washington University’s QuEST Center, found that almost nine in ten respondents said the US health care system is worsening or staying the same. Eighty percent agreed that it needs an overhaul. However, what does major reform even look like? Canada? The United Kingdom? Italy?

Before demanding change, it would be a responsible endeavor to see what others have to offer.

Be Like Canada, They Say

This past summer, Statistics Canada published comprehensive 2024 data that revealed some unflattering truths about the nation’s medical care system. Nationally, 36% of the country waited three months or longer to see a specialist. Thirty percent waited between one and three months. The numbers varied across the country. For example, Canada’s most populous province, Ontario, had wait times of 30 weeks for otolaryngologists and 20-plus weeks for ophthalmologists.

A CBC Marketplace investigation found that about half a million Canadians left emergency rooms before seeing a doctor because of long wait times and overcrowding.

For surgeries and replacements, the numbers are eye-opening. Only 68% of Canadians had hip replacements within the recommended six months. Cataract surgery? Just 69% within the recommended 112 days. Median MRI wait times climbed by 15 days, while median wait times for prostate cancer surgery jumped by nine days.

So-called hallway health care, in which patients are treated in break rooms, hallways, and supply closets, has become common in the Great White North. This is most pronounced in Ontario due to its surging foreign-born population, aging demographics, and persistent bed and staffing shortages.

This does not mean Canada is spending very little. Total consolidated government health costs will be about $400 billion this year, accounting for about one-quarter of nationwide spending.

Is it any wonder why Ottawa keeps pushing Medical Assistance in Dying? Canada cannot afford to take care of the living.

NHS, Innit?

If Canada’s single-payer model is a laughingstock, then you need to drop Tim Hortons’ Double-Double and have a cup of tea in Great Britain’s National Health Service.

This year, only 59% of patients were treated within 18 weeks, which fell short of the government’s 92% target. Twenty-two percent of Britons waited more than six weeks for tests and imaging, far higher than the goal of 5%. Here is a statistic that summarizes how bad the situation is: The National Health Service accomplished a 0.1% reduction in wait times, well below the 25% target.

Your Daily Dose of Freedom - Liberty First Daily Briefing
Thank you! Your subscription has been successful.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Like Canada, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his Labour government are spending more, with funding rising by £29 billion ($37 billion) a year. In total, health care is the largest public expenditure, accounting for about one-fifth of UK government spending. Starmer and his predecessors have struggled to deliver tangible results, no matter how much they keep doling out.

Despite Reform UK gaining in the polls as voters become increasingly frustrated with Labour and the Conservatives, the party does not appear to have much of a plan beyond promising to cut waste and bureaucracy.

“Look at what Labour’s done. Waiting lists are at record highs — the worst in the whole UK. They can’t get the staff in, and they can’t keep the staff they’ve got,” a party spokesperson said in a statement to the BBC. “A Reform government will sort this out. We’ll expose the waste, the failures, and the scandals in the NHS. We need to cut the waste, slash the bureaucracy, and end the inefficiency so patients actually get the care they need.”

Feeling Sick

Data from the World Health Organization suggests that 1.4 billion more people were living healthier lives in 2024, driven by better access to hygiene and sanitation, less tobacco use, and better air quality. Still, officials said in a May report that gaps are forming across global health systems due to increasing shortages of skilled health workers and underinvestment in primary health care.

As the UK and Canada no longer serve as beacons of single-payer systems, is anyone doing it right?

Michael Moore’s documentary Sicko was exposed as a fraud for claiming Cuba has a top-tier health system. Perhaps it was a sick joke because hospitals suffer from resource shortages, the system is under tremendous strain, and facilities are falling apart. Some reports suggest that the Cuban health care system collapsed this year.

Experts today generally look to countries like Japan and South Korea as models of free health care to emulate. However, these nations face mounting problems, too, especially as their populations age and people refrain from having children. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) may cite Sweden as a prime example. But Scandinavian countries also face aging populations, long wait times, capacity constraints, workforce shortages, and high taxes.

‘Free’ Health Care

Ultimately, medical care is now about trade-offs. In Canada, you give half of your income to the government in exchange for “free” point-of-access care or recommendations to use assisted dying services. In the UK, you will wait for hours in the ER and then months for imaging. In the United States, you either receive a life-changing hospital bill or pay exorbitant monthly premiums because of the Affordable Care Act.

Uh-oh. Let’s hope that the pain running up and down your leg is nothing serious. Better cut out the seed oil and sugar and transition to avocado oil and imported flour from Italy before it’s too late.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From

Andrew Moran

Economics Editor

Clips of the Day

Trump's Immigration Plan: What Does It Really Mean?

9/11, Cheney, and Unvetted Immigrants: A Critical Look

Ceasefire Talks: US, Ukraine, Russia Peace Progress?

Subscribe

Latest Posts

Minnesota Madness – C5 TV

President Trump shined a light on the scale of the tax fraud scheme in Minnesota, where billions have allegedly...

Nvidia Has the Power – But Why?

A few years ago, Nvidia was considered a little company that manufactured advanced chips for video games. Today,...