Federal Judge Cancels Mask Mandate for Travel – Will Biden Accept It?

What does this mean for American travelers?

by | Apr 19, 2022 | Articles, Law

The CDC mask mandate for travel on airplanes and other forms of public transport is over – for now. The rule was declared unlawful by a federal judge in Tampa on Monday afternoon. Later in the day, Biden administration officials said they had yet to decide what course they would take. Unless and until there is an appeal with an injunction, the TSA can no longer enforce masking rules. Major carriers including United Airlines and Delta Air Lines have already announced the termination of mask requirements on their flights. However, Americans traveling in the next couple of days should check with their airline for the latest.

The CDC had recently extended the mask mandate until May 3. Shortly after the court ruling was announced, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the Justice Department would be reviewing the decision and deciding whether to appeal.

CDC ‘Arbitrary and Capricious’

Your Daily Dose of Freedom - Liberty First Daily Briefing
Thank you! Your subscription has been successful.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle issued the court order killing the mandate. The judge wrote in her 59-page opinion that “irrespective of whether the CDC made a good or accurate decision, it needed to explain why it acted as it did.” She also concluded that as the CDC had failed to explain why it included exemptions – for example for toddlers or those eating – it had not “articulated a ‘rational connection between the facts found and the choices made.'” The court so ruled that the decision was “arbitrary and capricious,” and therefore due to be “set aside.”

The Florida judge said that good intentions were not a sufficient justification for the sweeping mandate. She stated that because “our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in the pursuit of desirable ends, the Court declares unlawful and vacates the Mask Mandate.” Mizelle explained that her order needed to include a nationwide scope because the government couldn’t ensure compliance with a more narrow one.

Health Freedom Defense Fund

New banner Legal Affairs with ScottThe ruling came from a case challenging the CDC mandate brought by the Health Freedom Defense Fund, a non-profit founded in 2020 by a vaccine critic named Leslie Manookian. After the ruling, Ms. Manookian said in a statement, “Unelected officials cannot do whatever they like to our personal freedoms just because they claim good motives and a desirable goal.” The group’s attorney, Brant C. Hadaway, said, “The judge found that the CDC exceeded its statutory authority, and that the CDC’s interpretation of its authority was not entitled to deference.”

Kathryn Kimball Mizelle sits on the bench of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. She was the youngest person chosen by President Donald Trump for a lifetime judicial appointment, at age 33. She has been a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, as well as Judge Katsas of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and Judge Pryor of the Eleventh Circuit. Despite the American Bar Association (ABA) rating Mizelle “Not Qualified” to serve as a federal trial court judge because she lacked any trial experience, she was confirmed to the bench by a 49-41 vote of the U.S. Senate on November 18, 2020.

~

Liberty Nation does not endorse candidates, campaigns, or legislation, and this presentation is no endorsement.

Read More From

Scott D. Cosenza, Esq.

Legal Affairs Editor

Clips of the Day

President of Peace Trump's Masterclass Domino Theory = Global Shift

Healthcare Strategy: Republicans vs. Democrats Revealed

Marco Rubio: Trump's Incredible Achievements in Foreign Policy & Border Security

Subscribe

Latest Posts

Davos Braces for a Trump Whirlwind

President Donald Trump will be delivering his address to the World Economic Forum’s annual event in Davos,...

Lawfare – Silencing Political Rivals Abroad

Politics is such an ugly business, especially when lawfare is involved. Why persuade voters to choose the best...