Ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, on April 29, 2026, the majority opinion declared that "[b]ecause the Voting Rights Act did not require Louisiana to create an additional majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of race in creating SB8, and that map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander."
.webp)
The question presented was:
"[W]hether compliance with the Voting Rights Act provides a compelling reason that may justify the intentional use of race in drawing legislative districts."
Oral Arguments
You can hear the oral arguments for this case here:
Or listen to them directly on the Supreme Court's website here.
The Ruling
You can read the final ruling in Louisiana v. Callais either in our read in full below, or click here for a PDF.
