There have been times in the history of the nation when members of the press were honored for the hard work they had carried out in service to the American public. At such times, deserving individuals were rewarded for their tenacity in keeping the people informed. This is not one of those moments.
In the latest episode of “This Is Why Nobody Trusts the Media,” the New York Press Club (NYPC) announced the recipient of their 2019 “Truth to Power” award. The prize is designed to single out “an individual whose body of work challenges the power establishment and/or defends journalists.” One would expect the club to select a journalist who is dedicated to safeguarding the sanctity of the First Amendment while holding the government accountable.
Instead, they picked CNN’s Jim Acosta.
Jim Acosta to Receive Award
Jim Acosta at the border wall
In a recent press release, Jane Tillman Irving, president of the NYPC wrote, “We are proud to honor a man such as Jim Acosta, who has proven himself throughout his storied, decades-long career to be a journalist of the utmost integrity.” Please refrain from laughing until you have finished reading this article. Irving went on to laud Acosta for his “unwavering commitment to fact and journalism.”
Acosta is known for his grandstanding during press conferences, his adversarial relationship with President Trump, and posting whiny tweets that resemble the journal entries of heartbroken teenage girls. But is he truly deserving of this award? Perhaps it depends on how you see today’s establishment media.
Acosta’s Antics
Over the past two years, Acosta has become the face of CNN’s ongoing smear campaign against President Trump. At press conferences, he has stepped over other reporters’ questions to browbeat Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and the president himself.
When President Trump attended his first summit with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, Acosta could not resist the opportunity to grab the spotlight. As the two leaders emerged from the conference, the CNN correspondent repeatedly peppered them with questions about the results of the meeting, even though they would later hold a press conference to address those questions. Even as they sat for a photo op, he proceeded to yell out questions at both Trump and Kim. And this, ladies and gentlemen, is CNN.
During one White House press conference, Acosta refused to hand over his microphone when it was another journalist’s turn to ask a question. Many on the right have pilloried Acosta for his behavior, but even other journalists on the left have complained about him. Al Tompkins, a faculty member of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, wrote a piece rebuking the reporter after he refused to give up the microphone. “Jim Acosta’s encounter Wednesday at a White House press conference was less about asking questions and more about making statements,” Tompkins wrote. “This was a White House event and he was talking to the president of the United States. A briefing is not the same as a cable news wrestling match, where sides shout at each other.”
A Worthy Recipient?
So that brings us back to the original question: Does Acosta deserve this award? If the establishment media were interested in hard-hitting reporting designed to keep the American public aware of the issues of the day, it is clear that CNN’s White House correspondent has no business winning such an honor.
But it’s long been clear that keeping the population informed is no longer the objective. Instead, most of the nation’s major news outlets function as propaganda mills designed to promote a progressive political agenda. The bias has become so prevalent that it has become nearly impossible to tell the difference between attempts at straight reporting and commentary. A media machine such as this relies on the type of journalist who wishes to influence viewers instead of delivering the news. Since this is the case, it is difficult to find another journalist who deserves this award more than Jim Acosta. At least he’s good at something!
Readers: We value your comments! Please weigh in on our comment section below. And remember to check out the web’s best conservative news aggregator Whatfinger.com
2 Comments
Jules P. Guidry
Like most of the awards which are given out these days on the left, and that is most of them that I can think of, are nothing more than pats on the back for themselves.
Pick an award, any award from the left, and prove me wrong. Think of the big one, the Nobel. Which 0zero got for what? Being elected the first multi-racial POTUS. Thats all. He had no accomplishments, other than being able to read a teleprompter well. Thats it.
Academy awards? Awards for folks pretending to be someone they are not. A lot of instances that would land someone in the nuthouse. Its an actual diagnosis which would qualify some folks for the rubber room treatment. Not to mention a stylish jacket with belts on the back.
The only awards I take seriously are those awarded to members of the Armed Forces. Those who put their all on the line for this naiton. The rest are mostly “feel good” awards for much of nothing.
Maybe its just me. Maybe not.
Diogenes
Yeah, give Acosta an award. I wonder whether the award comes with a cash stipend attached to it? Maybe an Academy Award will be next for him. It’s not so far-fetched. He’s got as loud a mouth as most everyone in Hollywood does. (I’m reminded of the oft-repeated dubious phase “bad actor”. Does that mean that a “bad actor” is a scoundrel, or just that he is a failure in having acting ability on the theatrical stage? Or could it be both?)
BTW, did you notice that Dan Rather is making a comeback on NPR through their back door? Since a generation has now passed, few remember Rather’s disgrace and (apparently temporary) banishment from being employed as a so-called journalist. Maybe Charlie Rose and Matt Lauer will soon reappear on the tube. When it comes to media and politics, viewers have very short memories.
What is a “journalist” anyway? It could be someone who writes a journal – or it used to mean someone who wrote for a newspaper. Now in mainstream media it means being a propagandist and a well paid hit man, figuratively speaking.
“A media machine such as this relies on the type of journalist who wishes to influence viewers instead of delivering the news.”
Today virtually everyone is trying to influence everyone else in some way, or in every way – from the politically powerful to the janitor. But you are correct, in that the opinions of a journalist or a Hollywood star are no more worthy of our attention or respect than that of anyone else. We have been primed to emulate them as role models or authority figures. They just have a bigger audience – or a bigger bullhorn and a broadcast network that most of us don’t have. And so they command and receive our respect, our attention and admiration, and even our imitation of them – deservedly or not. Usually not.
We cannot turn it off and walk away.